Inflight: ANA’s Boeing 787 from San Jose to Tokyo [PHOTOS]

[pb_slideshow group="2"] SLIDESHOW TEMPORARILY DISABLED. SORRY!

(Tokyo, Japan) Wow. I’ve just flown across the Pacific on the world’s most advanced commercial jet– the Boeing 787 Dreamliner. It is the  only 787 currently flying out of the Bay Area (United’s 787 to Houston was only temporary), and the only transoceanic flight out of San Jose International Airport. And despite the recent concerns about the 787, I felt completely safe on this plane, as did all other passengers I spoke with.

Now I’m sitting in a Tokyo hotel loading up some great slideshow photos of the trip and recounting the flight. Some thoughts:

>I live in San Francisco, so I imagined that the 45-60 minute drive (depending on traffic) down to San Jose would be a pain– however, the quick and easy check-in, security and boarding process at SJC made up for time I felt I’d lost on the trip down.

>The windows on the 787 really are bigger (by 20%)– it’s the first thing you notice when stepping on the plane. Instead pulling shades up and down, window seaters can adjust the tint electronically– sort of like Transitions Lenses.

>Lower pressure and higher humidity in the 787 cabin are detectable– for one thing, your eyes and lips don’t dry out as fast. I’m not sure how to describe the feeling other than to say that cabin air just felt softer. And I felt better when I got off the plane.

>I felt slightly more vibration from the engines on this flight, likely due to the plane’s composite structure. Also, seat cushions seemed harder than average.

>The plane exudes spaciousness with higher ceilings and a wider fuselage– there just feels like there is more space, even in economy class. The extra-large business class section (46 seats) seems to take up half the plane.

>Seatback inflight entertainment screens are big– 17 inches in business, 11 inches in economy. Both classes have 160 channels to choose from.

>In business class, the BEST seats are odd numbered window seats, and even numbered center seats– check out the slideshow and you will see how a center seat on this plane is like sitting at the helm of Starship Enterprise. If you can put up with the commotion around the galleys and lavatories, bulkhead seats are the best of the best seats on the plane in terms of personal space.

>Inflight dining in business class blew me away– the food and drink menu is 24 pages long (!), well suited to both western and Japanese palates. (I went native and ordered off the Japanese menu…See the slideshow above to learn which was my favorite dish. Oishii!)

>The Dreamliner is relatively small plane: Only 158 passengers (46 business, 112 economy), which makes it the right size for smaller markets like San Jose. Compare that to a Boeing 747 which holds 350-400 passengers. End result? Boarding is fast and easy– it feels like a less crowded domestic flight.

>ANA’s roundtrip coach fares between SJC and NRT are about $1,500… Business class fares are in the $4,000 range,  pretty much the same as Tokyo fares out of SFO. ANA is a Star Alliance partner, which means opportunities for earning and burning Mileage Plus miles on these flights.

>Finally, there’s a window in the lavatory– and the Toto toilet has a heated seat with sprayer–  you’ve got to flip through the slideshow above to see it!

So whaddya think? Would you be willing to drive down to San Jose to give ANA’s 787 a try? If you live in the South Bay, will you be able to break out of your habit of driving to SFO to fly to Asia? Would you consider flying ANA to points beyond Tokyo? Please leave your comments below! 

Disclosure: ANA covered the cost of my trip to Tokyo.

 

  • Pingback: Flying the Boeing 787 Dreamliner on ANA from San Jose to Tokyo - Amateur Traveler Travel Podcast

  • Pingback: Fantastic Business Class Award Space to Asia through October | milevalue.com

  • Pingback: UA first class vs NH business class vs CA first class - FlyerTalk Forums

  • Pingback: Mileage Plus ranking + new 787 @ SFO + PreCheck + Airport standoff - The BAT

  • John

    San Jose officials should start taking with JAL for Tokyo service, or EVA for Taipei if Asia is the hot market out of Silicon Valley. Of course, an airline needs to have the aircraft available to continue service, but ANA may have ruffled some feathers as JAL has now substituted aircraft on the Tokyo-San Diego run starting Jan 30th. San Jose should also look at high tech centers in Europe with service to London or Paris. American once flew from SJC to Paris.

  • John Shea

    We all know the bottlenecks of the Peninsula…….Burlingame- San Mateo, and Menlo Park-Palo Alto-Mt View, then when you close in on SJC airport at the 87 exit at eve rush hour, that can frustrate drivers too. So glad I run around mostly on trains and buses as I know their schedule.

    Heard the JAL 787 (from the second Boston incident) still had a leak when tested in Tokyo and is now grounded)……..Wonder if that 787 had a warranty. Maybe JAL should trade it in.

    A bidet in an airplane restroom…..how funny ! First time I saw one was in a B&B near Limerick, Ireland…..had no clue. The house looked just like one in Sunnyvale. Second time I saw one was in a home in Los Altos…….I thought, typical of Silicon Valley high brow types who dream of deodorant dispensers on their iphones.

  • chris

    Hey Larry: I meant to say from SFO… not San Francisco. I will adjust. And yes, we were driving pretty fast w no traffic. Thanks. –chris

  • Ken

    All airlines everywhere, but certainly in the USA, should be like this. The 787 is like a reality check for what sheeple passengers, me included, pay for but almost never get. If the FAA had one cohone in its entire peanut gallery we should re-regulate airlines and make them give passengers some semblance of comfort, like in a 787, for their money.

  • JK

    Chris – I want to be you! Sure wish they had these planes in the 90’s when I lived in Tokyo, rather than Delta’s beloved(?) L-1011 “Lead Sleds” and short-lived MD-11’s (which American also flew from San Jose back then.)

  • Larry

    It’s never 40 minute drive to San Jose from San Francisco unless you’re going 80

Editorial Disclaimer: This editorial content is not provided or commissioned by the credit card issuer. Opinions expressed here are author's alone, not those of the credit card issuer, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the credit card issuer. This site may be compensated through the credit card issuer Affiliate Program. Responses in the comments section are not provided or commissioned by the bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the bank advertiser. It is not the bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.”