Will Anbang Insurance thwart Marriott’s latest bid to buy Starwood? Will China’s government block Anbang? Stay tuned. (Image: Marriott)
Just when it looked like Marriott International had once again secured a deal to acquire Starwood Hotels & Resorts by sweetening Its original offer, a revised proposal has been submitted by Marriott’s counter-bidding nemesis, China’s Anbang Insurance and its co-investors.
Feeling a bit weary of all the back-and-forth? We are! Anyway, here’s the latest….
Starwood’s board said today that the latest offer from Anbang & company – an all-cash bid of $82.75 per share for all Starwood stock, and the fourth bid to be made in this see-saw battle – is “reasonably likely” to be superior to Marriott’s latest bid, which was estimated to be worth $79.53 per share. That last Marriott bid included $21 per share in cash and the rest on Marriott stock. (Starwood said Anbang’s newest bid, made on March 26, was $81 per share, but in discussions over the past two days, the bidders raised their price to $82.75.)
Once again, Starwood’s board said it would closely examine and discuss the new Anbang bid, and would continue to discuss “non-price terms related to the (Anbang) consortium’s revised proposal.” The board added: “there can be no assurance that discussions will result in a binding proposal from the consortium,” or that it will result in an agreement to sell Starwood to Anbang and friends.
Breakfast overlooking Hanalei Bay at Starwood’s St Regis Princeville (Photo: Chris McGinnis)
The Starwood board also reaffirmed that it “has not changed its recommendation in support of Starwood’s merger with Marriott.”
Meanwhile, there were reports that China’s government might also toss a monkey wrench into Anbang’s overseas buying spree. Caixin Online, a Chinese business news website, reported that the government’s China Insurance Regulatory Commission could be on the verge of blocking Anbang’s bid for Starwood and a separate Anbang offer for Strategic Hotels – a U.S.-based group that own several high-end hotels and resorts.
The problem, Caixin Online said, is that Chinese regulations bar the nation’s insurance companies from investing more than 15 percent of their assets abroad, a limit that would apparently be exceeded by either of the two proposed acquisitions.
NOTE: Be sure to click here to see all recent TravelSkills posts about: Should I tip my Uber driver? + Boeing 747 nearing its end? + Bargain hunters travel guide for 2016 + World’s best airline lounge? + Fares to Europe tumble
Do you follow us on Twitter? It’s a great way to keep up with the latest news!
Please join the 125,000+ people who read TravelSkills every month! Sign up here for one email-per-day updates!
AirBnb & other sites as this is looking better all the time…
Good point, Drew– you know that the President is no longer allowed to stay at the Waldorf in NYC due to the recent switch to Chinese ownership.
This is the general consensus of a lot of folks…
Interestingly enough, what would this mean to Starwood’s US Government business? I think that would go away as well…
But I do hear a lot of folks bemoaning Starwood’s purchase by Marriott as being completely awful.
It’s going to be interesting to see how this comes out in the end.
Everyone loses in this deal. It’s a lot like the Nabisco deal in 1988 in which thousands of folks lost their jobs and the cost of Oreos jumped about 50 %. Of course the problem will be a handful of people will come out of the deal so rich is not even funny while everyone else has to figure out how to pay for the deal.
It’s not good no matter who buys them.
Anbang’s offer seems kind of like “Marriot is offering $13 billion? Then we offer $13 billion and one!”
If Starwood is sold to China, I will simply not stay at the Brand.