TSA officers are trained to look for “suspicious” passenger behavior. (Image: TSA)
When at the airport, do you ever run late for a flight, yawn, whistle or rub your hands together a lot? Maybe you appear confused, wear a coat in summer, or display exaggerated emotions? Blink a lot or cover your mouth with your hand?
If so, you better watch out…you are being watched by a team of nearly 3,000 plain-clothed or uniformed “behavior protection officers” stationed at airports across the country.
The American Civil Liberties Union wants Congress to shut down a Transportation Security Administration program of surreptitious traveler surveillance, based on an investigation of internal TSA documents.
TSA’s Behavior Detection Program, which started seven years ago, trains the agency’s airport officers to look for passengers who exhibit suspicious, fearful or stressed-out behavior, and subject them to more intense scrutiny in security screenings.
The ACLU used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain internal TSA documents about the program. The organization said the documents indicate that the behaviors watched for by TSA officers are “unreliable,” according to academic studies included in the TSA files; and that TSA’s Behavior Detection officers – some of whom are in plain clothes at airports – sometimes engage in “racial and religious profiling” in their hunt for suspicious individuals.
You can download the full ACLU report here.
Can you spot any stressed-out or inappropriately dressed travelers? (Image: Jim Glab)
The ACLU charged that TSA’s Behavior Detection program “goes beyond vigilance and uses surveillance to impose consequences on travelers.” The main consequence is the intensified screening procedure they must undergo, “but the TSA’s documents also suggest that the TSA communicates directly with air carriers about some passengers after screening them, and that the carriers have then barred some of the passengers from boarding their flights.”
The so-called behavioral indicators that officers are supposed to look for are “inherently subjective,” the ACLU said, and TSA’s own files suggest that in many cases, its officers were seeing suspicious behavior when it didn’t exist, or were blowing it out of proportion – “a troubling sign of the subjectivity of the indicators and the discretion behavior detection officers wield in ‘observing’ them.”
It cited TSA guidelines that said officers should look for passengers exhibiting a “trancelike state,” who are wearing “inappropriate clothing,” and who are “avoiding direct contact with others.” The ACLU said such guidelines are “so subjective and vague as to be useless.”
The ACLU says TSA’s Behavior Detection program is based on unreliable indicators. (Image: TSA)
Other documents in the TSA files, the ACLU said, indicate that the agency’s behavior detection officers showed “a disproportionate focus on, and in some cases overt bias against, Arabs, Muslims, and those of Middle Eastern or South Asian descent.”
TSA’s training also warned its officers to be especially on the lookout for women who could be suicide bombers. The training material said this was because “females tend to be more emotional and therefore easier to indoctrinate.”
What do you think? Is behavior detection a cover for racial or religious profiling? Do you think it helps keep us safe? Please leave your comments below.
ICYMI, see the 25 most recent TravelSkills posts right here
In the market for a new credit card? See our “Credit Card Deals” tab to shop around! It helps us help you.
Don’t miss out! Join the 200,000+ people who read TravelSkills every month! Sign up here for one email-per-day updates!
The key to traveling hassle-free is definitely to be as white as possible.
While we were waiting for TSA, I could not get my husband to stop talking about how his mother was going to “explode” when some family thing happened. He kept using words like “nuclear” and “detonation” loudly. Did the TSA give us even a second look? Not for a moment, even when he demanded to have a bag hand-inspected rather than scanned.
Want to guess what would have happened if we’d been a few shades darker?
The most famous case of a terrorist act averted involves a search undertaken by an El Al security guard who thought it strange that a pregnant non-Arab was travelling alone to Palestine to meet her boyfriend. He had hidden a bomb in her carry-on, and nobody died.
The ACLU hates hunches like this, but they work — just like stop-and-frisk gets guns off the street. But the ACLU seeks chaos, not safety.
Yes, and their methods would NEVER pass the ACLU tests — but they work, which is why the ACLU hates them.
Dear Haggie…may I touch your genitals by stroking and gently licking them with my tongue until you climax in a gush of excited frenzy or squirt your love juice into my wanting mouth????????
Post-divorce, that’s a big part of my reason for flying! 🙂
What is this “face cream” of which you speak? That’s not something commonly carried by the majority of passengers. Isn’t “face cream” opaque? Could there be something secreted within the jar or tube? Seems like the common sense thing to do would be to thoroughly inspect this opaque, not-commonly-carried, chemical substance. Just in case, you never know, better to be safe than sorry, stitch in time saves nine. Don’t get upset if you have nothing to hide.
From the very beginning of heightened airport security in this country, I’ve maintained that the only way to ‘catch the bad guys’ is to have trained officers observing. If they think there might be an issue, ask the passenger a few questions. This is not rocket science, but common sense. Counting the ounces of face cream in my carryon is not particularly effective.
If you don’t like it definitely don’t go to the Tel Aviv airport.
Maybe we should have TSA screeners conducting random interviews with passengers in the same way the Israelis do. I don’t have any personal experience with airport security in Israel other than what little I’ve read, but it seems to be pretty effective. No shootings in terminals, no show bombers, no maniacs with box cutters…
This reminds me of the Monty Python and the Holy Grail segment where they are outlining the rules that are used to detect witches (like seeing if person floats). We should subcontract this to the Israelis – they seem to have figured out how to do it right from what I’ve seen in the check-in line in Tel Aviv
A complete stranger is going to demand that he touch my genitals so I can board a flight. Why would I behave nervously?