Norwegian will add 10 new routes this summer. (Map: Norwegian Air)
In its latest assault on the transatlantic market, Norwegian Air has unveiled details of its much-rumored plans to add a bunch of new low-fare routes to Europe from the northeastern U.S. this summer.
The airline said it will kick off service on 10 new routes, with one-way fares starting at $65, including taxes and government fees. That’s a total of 38 flights a week to four airports in Ireland and one in Scotland, all using the carrier’s new 737 MAX aircraft — a next-generation version of the single-aisle plane that has greater range and fuel efficiency.
The flights will operate out of Stewart Airport in Newburgh, N.Y. (about 60 miles up the Hudson from New York City); and from Providence, R.I. and Connecticut’s Bradley International near Hartford. Destinations include Cork, Shannon and Dublin in Ireland; Belfast, Northern Ireland; and Edinburgh, Scotland.
A screenshot from Norwegian’s U.S. website today (Feb. 23)
Why the smaller U.S. airports? “These airports offer good access into the New York, Boston and New England areas but carry significantly lower landing charges, allowing Norwegian to offer some truly affordable fares that will allow as many people as possible to fly,” the company said.
Specifically, the schedule calls for service to Edinburgh starting June 15 from all three U.S. airports (daily from Stewart, four a week from Providence and three a week from Bradley); the only transatlantic non-stops into Belfast, beginning July 1 from Stewart (three flights a week) and Providence (two a week); the only transatlantic flights into Cork, starting July 1 from Providence (three flights a week); and service into Shannon and Dublin from Stewart and Providence, also starting July 1. The Shannon flights will operate twice weekly from both airports, while the Dublin schedule includes daily service from Stewart and five a week from Boston.
A Boeing 737MAX in Norwegian livery. (Image: Boeing)
The new flights are already on sale. The $65 one-way fares are subject to capacity controls, and do not include separate charges for a variety of services and amenities.
Norwegian is on a strong growth track. The airline is due to take delivery of nine more 787-9s this year, which it uses on longer-haul U.S. routes, along with half a dozen 737 MAX aircraft. Norwegian already flies to London Gatwick from Oakland, Los Angeles, New York JFK, Ft. Lauderdale and Orlando, and on several other transatlantic routes.
Norwegian is also negotiating with European carriers Ryanair and EasyJet about the creation of a low-cost carrier alliance that would permit passengers to easily connect among their networks.
Soooo dear readers, how do you feel about flying a 737 across the Atlantic? Have you flown Norwegian Air yet? Please leave your comments below.
ICYMI, see the 25 most recent TravelSkills posts right here
In the market for a new credit card? See our “Credit Card Deals” tab to shop around! It helps us help you.
Don’t miss out! Join the 200,000+ people who read TravelSkills every month! Sign up here for one email-per-day updates!
John R. Grout says
March 6, 2017 at 5:36 pmShannon was also a seaplane stop. All the airports from LaGuardia to London City Airport had seaplane runways because Pan Am’s initial service to Northern Europe used seaplanes.
RichLL says
March 5, 2017 at 3:49 pmIceland is 2 hours closer though. Shannon used to be a fuel stop in the bad old days so I expect a flight from that far west would rarely have to stop for fuel.
RichLL says
February 25, 2017 at 10:40 amTo the East Coast, yes. Aer Lingus do the same.
But further distance are flown by a 757 (Icelandair) and A330 (Aer Lingus)
I’d expect a few fuel stops in places like Gander
Laura616 says
February 24, 2017 at 7:24 amI have been flying Norwegian between Fort Lauderdale and Gatwick since it started. It’s a very nice dreamliner and they always arrive early which isn’t a problem at Gatwick but is always a problem in FLL. So we are always on the aircraft for at least an hour waiting for steps because there’s no gate and then there’s the bus ride to terminal. And there’s always a long wait for luggage. It is a budget airline and economy seats are very cheap. The convenience of the route for me personally is worth doing so I can put up with a few irritations.
jeff says
February 23, 2017 at 5:52 pmJohn, I have not been able to get consistent ranges on the 737 Max. Would one be viable from ATL to LHR or CDG? I would think so (except bad wind as I’m seeing a 3800 nm ranges). It seems like a no brainer for SWA out of ATL now that the have a hud here.
John R. Grout says
February 23, 2017 at 3:37 pmIcelandic has been flying 737’s across the Atlantic for years. Except in truly vile weather, trans-Atlantic flights with a stop in Reykjavik do not require ETOPS (extended twin engine operation with only one functional engine), but may end up with longer flight times to dodge from rock to rock with open airports. Recent high-end 737’s do have ETOPS, allowing more direct non-stop trans-Atlantic flights.